Tuesday, April 12, 2016

WHY THE GOP, AND ESTABLISHMENT IS AFRAID OF TRUMP.



Why is it that each Trump rally looks larger than the GOP convention? 

BECAUSE IT IS!
Trump has a huge audience every where he goes and I am glad to hear he is now warning everyone at each rally of the dirty negative ads the other candidate’s super PAC’s are running about him!

So while the devil’s minions spew their hate ads, Trump supporters are growing in YUGE numbers!

The establishment and the E.P.A. is shaking, because the Trump is going to undo the evil mandates on coal, carbon emissions, and all the evil lies it has written!

The people cheer because THEY FINALLY HAVE A VOICE – WHAT TRUMP WANTS IS WHAT THEY WANT!

Thx / Dennis Michael Lynch .


                                                     THE GOP IS AT WAR WITH THE PEOPLE!

                                                               The GOP BLEW IT BIG TIME!
They exposed themselves as deceivers, liars, connivers, cheats, patsies, new world order thugs, lovers of war on terror, hate mongers, bullies, lawless, and most of all – they have exposed their war on “WE THE PEOPLE”.


                                                "Bottom line is"… Both parties are in deep trouble in 2016.

The DNC is running two Marxists, one a criminal and the other a total crackpot… 
And the RNC is trying to pass off a known fraud from Canada for U.S. Commander-in-Chief.

Contrary to Cruz supporter rhetoric, none of this has anything to do with Trump. All of it is about Cruz and his habit of lying and defrauding the people. All of this is about the Republican establishment working in concert with the Democratic Party to End the American Presidency.

                            If you are offended by the facts… you are on the wrong side of the truth."


                       WHY THE GOP, AND ESTABLISHMENT IS AFRAID OF TRUMP.

                                                       "Trump is an American Patriot"
                                             Trump doesn't play by any of the GOP rules.

Trump breaks up this nice, cozy relationship between big government, big media, and big business.

                         All the rules are out the window if Trump wins the Presidency.

                      The other politicians will protect Obama and his aides but not Trump.

                                                                     Remember:

Trump is the guy who publicly questioned Obama's birth certificate. He questioned Obama's college records and how a mediocre student got into an Ivy League university.

                    Now, he's doing something no Republican has the chutzpah to do.
 He's questioning our relationship with Mexico; he's questioning why the border is wide open; he's questioning why no wall has been built across the border; he's questioning if allowing millions of illegal aliens into America is in our best interests; he's questioning why so many illegal aliens commit violent crimes, yet are not deported; and he's questioning why our trade deals with Mexico, Russia and China are so bad.

Trump has the audacity to ask out loud why American workers always get the short end of the stick.

Good question!

I'm certain Trump will question what happened to the almost billion dollars given in a rigged no-bid contract to college friends of Michelle Obama at foreign companies to build the defective Obamacare website. By the way, that tab is now up to $5 billion.

Trump will ask if Obamacare's architects can be charged with fraud for selling it by lying. Trump will investigate Obama's widespread IRS conspiracy, not to mention Obama's college records. Trump will prosecute Clinton and Obama for fraud committed to cover up Benghazi before the election. 

How about the fraud committed by employees of the Labor Department when they made up dramatic job numbers in the last jobs report before the 2012 election?

              Obama, the multinational corporations and the media need to stop Trump. 

They recognize this could get out of control. If left unchecked, telling the raw truth and asking questions everyone else is afraid to ask,...

Trump could wake a sleeping giant.

Obama has committed many crimes. 

No one else but Trump would dare to prosecute.

He will not hesitate.

Once Trump gets in and gets a look at the cooked books and Obama's records, the game is over.

The jig is up.

The goose is cooked. 

Holder could wind up in prison. Jarrett could wind up in prison.

Obama bungler Corzine could wind up in prison for losing $1.5 billion of customer money. Clinton could wind up in jail for deleting 32,000 emails or for accepting bribes from foreign governments while Secretary of State, or for misplacing $6 billion as the head of the State Department, or for lying about Benghazi . The entire upper level management of the IRS could wind up in prison.

Obamacare will be De-funded and dismantled. Obama himself could wind up ruined, his legacy in tatters. Trump will investigate. Trump will prosecute. Trump will go after everyone involved. That's why the dogs of hell have been unleashed on Donald Trump.

Yes, it's become open season on Donald Trump. The left and the right are determined to attack his policies, harm his businesses, and, if possible, even keep him out of the debates. But they can't silence him. And they sure can't intimidate him.

The more they try, the more the public will realize that he's the one telling the truth.

Don't you ever wonder why the GOP has never tried to impeach Obama?

Don't you wonder why Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell talk a big game, but never actually try to stop Obama?

Don't you wonder why Congress holds the purse strings, yet has never tried to de-fund Obamacare or Obama's clearly illegal executive action on amnesty for illegal aliens?

For registered Republicans, this has got to be beyond bizarre, extremely difficult to comprehend and It surely defies logic.




Go Trump! ... Let's Roll...

I will vote TRUMP 2016 .. No matter what Party..!!

Thanks STORM CLOUD./.



Saturday, January 23, 2016

Cruz And Rubio Are Not Eligible To Be President




It is critical for U.S. citizens to understand the meaning of the Constitution's term "natural born citizen" when choosing a prospective Commander-in-Chief. The candidate must be free from all possibility of foreign loyalties through either his or her parentage or place of birth .


Why is a narrow interpretation of "natural born citizen" essential to the future of our nation?

If it is sufficient for a person to have only one U.S. citizen parent in order to be considered a "natural born" citizen, then dual citizens could become President, including dual citizens of countries hostile to the United States.

Likewise, if the Constitution allows persons born outside the U.S. with only one U.S. citizen parent to qualify as President, then many persons could be dual citizens of their country of birth. This is Ted Cruz's situation. Such persons could have divided loyalties to their place of birth or to the non-citizen parent's country of origin. 

If it is enough for a person to qualify by being a "birthright" citizen who was born on U.S. soil to parents who are not U.S. citizens (Marco Rubio's situation), what if communist or radical Islamic nations use this as a strategy to infiltrate? Over a period of years, they could send refugees, students, or professors to the U.S. to carry out their plan.

 What if one of those immigrants has a "birthright" child, posing as pro-American until the time is ripe to seek the Presidency?

 The only way to stop such infiltration is a strict interpretation of the phrase "natural born citizen" which denies "natural born" status to children who are born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents.



The key phrase to properly interpret the 14th Amendment is this: "and subject to the jurisdiction thereof."

 Foreigners and their children are not subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S., but are only subject to their country of origin - although they are required to comply with U.S. law while they are on American soil. 

Not all who must obey American law owe allegiance to the United States.



Why did the Framers include the qualifier "natural born" in the President's citizenship qualification? 

It is important to understand their intent.

John Jay, the first Chief Justice of the United States, sent a letter to George Washington stating "Whether it would not be wise & seasonable to provide a ... strong check to the admission of Foreigners into the administration of our national Government; and to declare expressly that the Command in chief of the American army shall not be given to, nor devolve on, any but a natural born Citizen."


Justice Joseph Story noted in his 1833 Commentaries on the Constitution that "the purpose of the natural born Citizen clause was thus to cut off all chances for ambitious foreigners, who might otherwise be intriguing for the office; and interpose a barrier against those corrupt interferences of foreign governments in executive elections."


The qualifier "natural born" was thus added to the eligibility requirement for the President to prevent the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces and Chief Executive of the United States from having foreign allegiance, dividing their loyalty.

Although the intent of the phrase "natural born citizen" was clear at the Constitution's signing, we now live with the consequences of ignoring the Framer's definition - a sitting President who is ineligible. 

No one disputes that Barack Obama's father was not an American citizen

According to the Framers, this fact alone makes Obama ineligible to be Commander-In-Chief of the armed forces. Furthermore, his father was on record as being hostile toward the U.S. and our ally, Great Britain.

 In Dreams From My FatherBarack Obama, Jr., opined his father's beliefs. 

By his own written words, Obama's loyalties are divided, just as the Founders warned.


The current Republican Party Presidential field has at least two ineligible candidates. 

Ted Cruz is ineligible on two counts: His father was not a U.S. citizen, and he was born outside the U.S. Marco Rubio is ineligible because neither of his parents were U.S. citizens when he was born.


At some point, the citizens of this country have to insist on the rule of law. 

We must adhere to the Constitution, the legal foundation on which all our laws rest.

How can we trust as our national leader, a man who lies when he takes the oath of office to "preserve, protect and defend the Constitution," while knowing full well that he has violated the Constitution's natural born citizenship requirement? 

Barack Obama's lawless regime was built on the illegal foundation of his ineligibility to be President. We should expect nothing different if either Cruz or Rubio are sworn into office.


The Constitution has been ignored and misinterpreted for so long that our nation has been "fundamentally transformed" into something far removed from what the Framers intended. We are dangerously close to losing our Republic.
WE the PEOPLE can take a critical step toward restoring the rule of law if we reject Rubio and Cruz as eligible candidates on our states' ballots and refuse to vote for them in any primary election or caucus.


Tragically, the Democrats made history in 2008 by failing a crucial test.

 One state Democratic Party certified Obama as "eligible" under the Constitution, and the remaining 49 state parties removed the nominee eligibility certification statement altogether.

Now the conscience of each state Republican Party will be put to the test. 

Will they follow the lawless actions of Democrats? Or will they follow the Framer's instructions in the Constitution and declare Cruz and Rubio ineligible?


http://freedomoutpost.com/2016/01/ineligible-for-the-office-of-president/

Thanks  :  Evalyn Bennett





Natural Born Citizen :  Dr. Herb Titus explains what this term means in light of President Obama's recent birth certificate disclosure. Part 1 of 2.

30 Yr/ Dr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa.

He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of th
e bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, the Army Court of Criminal Appeals, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits.

His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia, and to state courts in Idaho, North Dakota, Texas, and Virginia..............



.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=esiZZ-1R7e8







“Natural Born Citizen” (Born on US sovereign soil .To (Two CITIZEN PARENTS")



Written on Parchment from the Soil of our Nation..and,scribed by the Blood of our Founders and Patriots ,who gave us our Republic,and Constitution.

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution as adopted 17 September 1787:

No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.

Our founders and framers gave us these words to protect us .for the sole purpose of preventing anyone born of foreign, dual or divided national allegiance from ever entering the Oval Office.

John Jay said in a letter to General George Washington, recommending that the framers should strengthen the Citizenship requirements for the office of the President.

Jay expressed fear of foreign influence and wanted to make sure the President and Commander In Chief owed his allegiance solely to the United States of America. He wanted another adjective added to the eligibility clause, i.e., ‘natural’. And that word ‘natural’ goes to the Citizenship status of one’s parents via natural law.

Upon receiving Jay’s letter, General Washington passed on the recommendation to the convention where it was adopted in the final draft.


“Natural Born Citizen” Born on US sovereign soil .To CITIZEN PARENTS"


See a transcription of Jay’s letter to Washington at this / : 
http://www.kerchner.com/images/protectourliberty/johnjay1787lettertogeorgewashington.jpg










Wednesday, January 13, 2016

Ted Cruz Citizenship Timeline



Ted Cruz Citizenship Timeline 
State of Delaware Vital Records says.




FACTUAL CRUZ CITIZENSHIP TIMELINE

(Everything presented in this timeline is a matter of public record. All of it is based upon publicly reported events, public statements made by Rafael Cruz, Ted Cruz, officials with the Elect Ted movement or US and Canadian officials."
1957 - After working as a teen to help Fidel Castro gain power in Cuba, and being imprisoned for his actions by the Batista regime, Cuban Rafael Cruz applies for admittance to the University of Te'as as a foreign student and enters the US on a four year student visa to attend four years of college. He is a Cuban citizen attending a US college on a foreign student visa obtained through the US Consulate in Havana.
1961-1962 - After graduating college at the University of Texas, and upon the expiration of his foreign student visa, Cruz Sr. applied for and received "political asylum" and was issued a "green card." A green card is a permit to reside and work in the United States, without becoming a "citizen" of the United States, in this case, under political asylum from Castro's Cuba. His citizenship status was that of a Cuban national living and working in the United States, under a green card work permit. According to US laws, the "green card" holder must maintain permanent resident status, and can be removed from the United States if certain conditions of this status are not met.
1964-1966 - Cruz Sr. takes a few odd jobs, marries and moves to Canada to work in the oil fields. The Cruz family resides in Canada for the next eight years. “I worked in Canada for eight years,” Rafael Cruz says. “And while I was in Canada, I became a Canadian citizen.” – (From and interview with NPR) "Peter Spiro, a legal expert on US citizenship at Temple University. Spiro says Rafael Cruz's multi-country odyssey did not follow traditional models for immigration. SPIRO - “Ted Cruz himself seems to be an advocate of those traditional immigration models. Maybe he should be a little more tolerant of the nontraditional Versions, given his own father's history.”
1970 - Ted Cruz is born in Canada, to two parents who had lived in Canada for at least four years at that time, and had applied for and received Canadian citizenship under Canadian Immigration and Naturalization Laws, as stated by Rafael Cruz. As a result, US statutes would have voided the prior "green card" status which requires among other things, permanent residency within the United States and obviously, not becoming a citizen of another country during the time frame of the US green card.

1974 - The Cruz family moves to the United States when Ted is approximately four years old. Rafael Cruz has publicly stated that he remained a citizen of Canada until he renounced his Canadian citizenship when he applied for and became a US Naturalized citizen in 2005. As a result, his wife and son were also Canadian citizens, his son being born a citizen of Canada in 1970.
2005 - Rafael Cruz applies for legal US citizenship and renounces his Canadian citizenship. No record of Ted renouncing his Canadian citizenship or applying for US citizenship exists as of 2005.
2013 - Freshman Senator Ted Cruz is a rising star in the Tea Party movement, and calls for him to run for the White House begin. In July, Ted Cruz is Questioned by the press about his interest in running for President, and the issue of his Canadian born citizenship is brought up Sen. Ted Cruz rejected questions Sunday over his eligibility to be president, saying that although he was born in Canada “the facts are clear” that he is a US citizen.
“My mother was born in Wilmington, Delaware. She is a US. citizen, so I'm a US citizen by birth,” Cruz told A&C. “I'm not going to engage in a legal debate.”
NOTE: Senator Cruz omits the part of his father's story, in particular, the part about his parents applying for and receiving Canadian citizenship prior to Ted's birth in Calgary. He also attempts to gloss past the actual definition of natural)born Citizen by implying it is a mere legal debate for others to figure out.

August 2013 - As Ted's political stock rises in the Tea Party, so do press questions about his eligibility for office. Ted decides to quiet the questions by releasing his birth certificate, which now becomes absolute proof of Ted's Canadian citizenship at birth, 1970, Calgary, Canada. The release of the Canadian birth records only serve to further fuel the controversy.

Ted seeks Legal Counsel, as the media is now pressing members of Canadian Immigration and Naturalization to clear the matter up, when instead, Canadian officials confirm the Ted Cruz was in fact born a legal citizen of Canada, the son of two parents who had also applied for and received Canadian citizenship prior to Ted's birth.

 “He's a Canadian,” said Toronto lawyer Stephen Green, past chairman of the Canadian Bar Association's Citizenship and Immigration Section.
“Generally speaking, under the Citizenship Act of 1947, those born in Canada were automatically citizens at birth unless their parent was a foreign diplomat, ”said ministry spokeswoman Julie Lafortune.

Legal counsel advises Ted to "renounce his Canadian citizenship" in order to make himself eligible to run for the presidency. Of course, renouncing one's original citizenship only further proves one's original citizenship.

May 2014 - Ted Cruz legal counsel files to renounce Ted's Canadian citizenship in an effort to make him eligible to run for high office under the natural born Citizen clause Article II in the US Constitution.

AUSTIN, Texas - Canada-born US Sen. Ted Cruz has given up his citizenship from his birth country, making good on a promise from last summer. spokeswoman Catherine Frazier said “the Tea Party favorite formally gave up his citizenship May 14th. He received official confirmation of the action at his Houston home Tuesday.”

News that he had renounced his citizenship was first reported by the Dallas Morning News. The newspaper also bro$e that Cruz had dual Canadian) US citizenship when he released his birth certificate in August.

Frazier said Cruz “he is pleased to have the process finalized” and that it “makes sense he should be only an American citizen.”- of course, the Constitution does not require that one be only an American citizen, but rather a natural born Citizen.
As of February 4, 2015 - No evidence of any US Citizenship has been released to confirm anything at all about the true citizenship status of Ted Cruz.








Because Ted Cruz has been confirmed a legal citizen of Canada up until renouncing his Canadian citizenship in May of 2014, and because he has been confirmed a citizen of Canada at birth, and because his father is on public record stating that he and his wife became citizens of Canada during their eight years living in Canada and because Rafael Cruz remained a citizen of Canada until he renounced and applied for legal US citizenship in 2005. 

There is simply NO WAY that Ted Cruz was, is or ever can be a Natural Born Citizen of the United States eligible for the offices of President or Vice President. 






So, we have TWO Canadian documents pertaining to Ted's Canadian citizenship from birth, and ONE US document allegedly proving that his mother was from the USA.....
Here's the question....

WHERE IS ANY U.S. DOCUMENT OF LEGAL CITIZENSHIP OF ANY TYPE, AT ANY TIME, FOR TED CRUZ?

(dual citizens have dual papers from both countries).. We have authenticated Ted's Canadian citizenship, but we are still waiting for any documents that authenticate Ted's claim to be a legal US citizen)

 A Natural Born Citizen has NO dual Citizenship.!



The facts are all well documented. You decide... 


One who inherits their Citizenship at birth via nature alone, from their natural birth father, is a natural born Citizen of the United States. 

According to all available information on Ted Cruz and his family, Ted Cruz was a native born citizen of Canada and not a natural born Citizen of the United States. Now, Ted is either not too bright, or not too honest... But he is at least one of the two... 

and what about the Party leaders behind this legal shell game?




Ted Cruz,Needs to Step Down..  For the Good of the Country.

" Ted Cruz is NOT A Natural Born Citizen " (dual citizens have dual papers from both countries)

 A Natural Born Citizen has NO dual Citizenship.!





Ted Cruz’s former constitutional law professor...Calls Cruz Clueless On Constitution ...

Harvard law professor Laurence Tribe believes there is doubt whether Sen. Ted Cruz (R-Tex.) is constitutionally eligible to be elected president.

Professor Tribe believes it is unclear whether Cruz qualifies as a  “natural born citizen,” .

He completely destroy his presidential qualifications !.



Ted Cruz Gets OWNED By His Own Harvard Law Professor: Calls Cruz Clueless On Constitution (VIDEO)


Laurence Tribe, who was Ted Cruz’s own Constitutional Law professor at Harvard, visited MSNBC’s The Last Word, to discuss Cruz’s total lack of understanding on, and general contempt for, the Constitution of the United States.
Professor Tribe said point blank that Ted Cruz only cares about the Constitution when it benefits Ted Cruz, or if he can use it as a weapon to hurt other Americans. Otherwise, he could not care less if the Constitution says you have a right he doesn’t want you to have.
You really can’t argue with Professor Tribe’s assessment of Cruz on that. He couldn’t be more correct.
http://www.addictinginfo.org/2016/01/12/ted-cruz-gets-owned-by-his-own-harvard-law-professor-calls-cruz-clueless-on-constitution-video/


Then there is Dr. Titus, A Professor of Constitutional law.

Dr. Herbert W. Titus is of counsel to the law firm of William J. Olson, P.C. Prior to his association with this firm, Mr. Titus taught constitutional law, common law, and other subjects for nearly 30 years at five different American Bar Association approved law schools. From 1986 to 1993, he served as the founding Dean of the College of Law and Government in Regent University, Virginia Beach, Virginia. Prior to his academic career, he served as a Trial Attorney and a Special Assistant United States Attorney with the United States Department of Justice in Washington, D.C. and Kansas City, Missouri. Today he is engaged in a general practice with a concentration in constitutional strategy, litigation, and appeals.

Mr. Titus holds the J.D. degree (cum laude) from Harvard and the B.S. degree in Political Science from the University of Oregon from which he graduated Phi Beta Kappa. He is an active member of the bar of Virginia and an inactive member of the bar of Oregon. He is admitted to practice before the United States Supreme Court, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, the United States Court of Claims, and the United States Courts of Appeals for the Sixth, Seventh, Ninth, Tenth, District of Columbia and Federal Circuits. His constitutional practice has taken him into federal district courts in Alabama, Arizona, Georgia, Montana, North Carolina, Oklahoma, Oregon, Texas, Wyoming, and the District of Columbia and the state courts of Idaho, Texas and North Dakota.

http://www.obamareleaseyourrecords.com/2011/05/attorney-dr-herb-titus-born-in-hawaii.html






A Professor of Constitutional law  Natural Born Citizen.

Birthers: Cruz the Canadian Must Step Down

If Obama's not eligible for POTUS status (even while allegedly born in Hawaii),

then Cruz must step down. It's as simple as that. 


http://www.obamareleaseyourrecords.com/2011/05/attorney-dr-herb-titus-born-in-hawaii.html





According to Article II, Section I, Clause 5 of the U. S. Constitution, a candidate for the Presidency must be a “natural born citizen,” that is, a second generation American, a U.S. citizen, whose parents were also U.S. citizens at the time of the candidate’s birth.

Every child born on US SOIL is a US Citizen..// but not all are “natural born citizens” 


Mr. Cruz was born in Canada to a U.S. citizen mother and a non-U.S. citizen (Cuban) father.

 Mr. Cruz is not a natural born citizen and therefore not eligible to be President, because he does not satisfy the one and only common law definition of a natural born citizen confirmed by the unanimous U.S. Supreme Court in Minor v. Happersett, 88 U.S. 162 (1875)..

which is a child born in a country to parents who were its citizens at the time of the child’s birth. 



A statutory citizen (bestowed by man's pen) can never be a "natural born" citizen (bestowed by God/nature)

...Blood & Soil.

Allowing constitutionally ineligible candidates to debate will only give the false impression to the American people that such persons are constitutionally eligible to be elected President.


This result is more damaging to the Constitution and the rule of law..



A Lesson from History.

 Is Being Born a Citizen (Citizen at/by Birth) of the United States of Sufficient Citizenship Status to be President of the United States

 The Founders and Framers Emphatically Decided …

 No, It Was Not!




Article II Facts

Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 of U.S. Constitution as adopted 17 September 1787:
No Person except a natural born Citizen, or a Citizen of the United States, at the time of the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the Office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that Office who shall not have attained to the Age of thirty five Years, and been fourteen Years a Resident within the United States.
 http://www.art2superpac.com/issues.html



A Citizen is One Thing, But a Natural Born Citizen is Another ..

http://puzo1.blogspot.com/.

https://cdrkerchner.wordpress.com/

http://www.obamareleaseyourrecords.com/