A Look Back, Gulf of Mexico oil rig explosion,to “reform” the energy industry,
Could the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil rig explosion be part of a larger scheme to “reform” the energy industry, just as the Obama administration has “reformed” healthcare, banking and automobile manufacturers? Worse, is “cap and trade”—possibly the worst legislation ever penned—the ultimate endgame behind this spill, which they are now capitalizing upon?
The first red flag receiving virtually no attention is that Halliburton (of Dick Cheney fame) had finished a cementing process only 20 hours prior to Deepwater Horizon erupting in flames. Lawsuits have already been filed, with Reuters reporting on April 29, “Halliburton improperly and negligently performed its job in cementing the well, increasing the pressure at the well and contributing to the fire, explosion and resulting oil spill.”
As a result, a high-pressure pocket of deep oil 30,000 feet beneath the ocean floor erupted with the force of a gigantic, non-stop fire hose. A surviving worker on the rig, John Kersey, said it sounded “like a war zone” as alarms were triggered, electricity shorted out, and flames shot 300 feet into the air. The inferno-like blaze could be seen 35 miles away.
CONNECTIONS
Suspicions arise when an ownership paper trail is followed. Halliburton subcontracted for a company named Transocean, which leased and operated Deepwater Horizon for British Petroleum (BP). Transocean is a subsidiary of Sonat Inc., which merged with the El Paso Corporation (EPC) in March 1999. Douglas Foshee, EPC’s chairman, president and CEO, was hired away from Halliburton. The interim CEO prior to his arrival was Ronald Kuehn of Sonat.
Another previous CEO of EPC was William Wise, who served with Cheney on the influential National Petroleum Council. EPC was the largest single contributor from Texas for Bush-Cheney’s 2000 presidential campaign. Similarly, Wise helped Cheney raise $8 million for the National Republican Senatorial Committee.
These incestuous relationships aren’t limited to the GOP. Barack Obama and his Chicago crime network expect to reap handsome profits in the future. Step No. 1 in this process began with Chicago’s Joyce Foundation, which had John Ayers (brother of terrorist William Ayers) on its board. Another board member was then-Illinois Sen. Barack Obama.
The Joyce Foundation created the Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX), which in turn received financing from Franklin Raines, former head of Fannie Mae, a prime mover in our recent housing market collapse and economic recession.
Of vital importance is CCX’s role as the sole “carbon trading system” under Obama’s cap-and-trade bill. CCX would act as a quasi-stock market to buy and sell energy emission allowances. Richard Sandor, CCX founder, estimated a $10 trillion potential for this easily manipulated market.
BILDERBERG INFLUENCE
With that much money at stake, a host of high rollers enter the picture. Namely, one company with a huge ownership interest in CCX is Generation Investment Management (GIM), whose chairman is former Vice President Al Gore. Four other GIM founders include Henry Paulson, David Blood, Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris—all of Goldman Sachs. Not surprisingly, Goldman Sachs purchased 10 percent of CCX in 2006.
One other individual on CCX’s board of directors is the controversial Maurice Strong, a New Age occultist with direct ties to the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds.
Since Goldman Sachs has now become part of the equation, we next need to examine its non-executive chairman, Peter Sutherland, who formerly filled the same role at BP, the company at the center of this debacle. As the third-largest global energy company in existence, BP has four direct links to Bilderberg: former CEO John Brown, chairman Carl Henric Svanberg, chief executive Tony Hayward and Sutherland. In addition, Sutherland formerly served as the World Trade Organization’s director general, EU commissioner and chairman of the European Trilateral Commission.
This background information is important because the top recipient of BP donations during the 2008 presidential campaign was Obama. Similarly, the second highest political action committee contributing to a political candidate in 2008 was Goldman Sachs. The beneficiary of their largess: Obama.
Undoubtedly, one of Obama’s primary big government missions is to enact cap-and-trade legislation. To implement this plan, influential decision makers such as Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner are all members of the financial mafia. In this vein, David Mayer Rothschild stressed that last year’s Copenhagen environmental summit was “an attempt to establish a world government.”
Likewise, AFP editor Jim Tucker reported on March 24, 2007 that General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, said political leaders should “address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide.”
The Rothschilds have spent huge amounts of money promoting the global warming hoax. Goldman Sachs is obviously an arm of their empire, whereas BP is among a host of companies in Nathan Rothschild’s portfolio.
A TEAM EFFORT
Considering the nature of these prominent players, one factor binds them all together. Cap and trade, via the CCX, will tax carbon-dioxide emissions and generate trillions in revenue. Only a month ago, however, this legislation sat dead in the water with virtually no support from Congress or the American public. But now, with an environmental catastrophe at hand, could it be resurrected and enacted in a way that mirrored President Clinton’s counter-terrorism bill following the OKC bombing?
Ironically, big oil and global bankers are two of the most ardent supporters of climate change legislation. In this sense, seeming adversaries such as “environmentalist” Gore and BP are on the same team; as are Cheney’s Halliburton, Goldman Sachs and Obama’s CCX. It should also be noted that prior to their demise, the corrupt Enron Corporation lavished huge amounts of praise on cap and trade legislation.
Lastly, if gasoline prices surge this summer due to the Gulf of Mexico spill, one obvious benefactor will be the new green-friendly “smart cars” owned by GM (Government Motors).
As AFP goes to press, all containment efforts have failed as millions of gallons of oil continue to gush into the Gulf of Mexico on a weekly basis.
BILDERBERG INFLUENCE
With that much money at stake, a host of high rollers enter the picture. Namely, one company with a huge ownership interest in CCX is Generation Investment Management (GIM), whose chairman is former Vice President Al Gore. Four other GIM founders include Henry Paulson, David Blood, Mark Ferguson and Peter Harris—all of Goldman Sachs. Not surprisingly, Goldman Sachs purchased 10 percent of CCX in 2006.
One other individual on CCX’s board of directors is the controversial Maurice Strong, a New Age occultist with direct ties to the Rockefellers and the Rothschilds.
Since Goldman Sachs has now become part of the equation, we next need to examine its non-executive chairman, Peter Sutherland, who formerly filled the same role at BP, the company at the center of this debacle. As the third-largest global energy company in existence, BP has four direct links to Bilderberg: former CEO John Brown, chairman Carl Henric Svanberg, chief executive Tony Hayward and Sutherland. In addition, Sutherland formerly served as the World Trade Organization’s director general, EU commissioner and chairman of the European Trilateral Commission.
This background information is important because the top recipient of BP donations during the 2008 presidential campaign was Obama. Similarly, the second highest political action committee contributing to a political candidate in 2008 was Goldman Sachs. The beneficiary of their largess: Obama.
Undoubtedly, one of Obama’s primary big government missions is to enact cap-and-trade legislation. To implement this plan, influential decision makers such as Robert Rubin, Larry Summers, Paul Volcker and Timothy Geithner are all members of the financial mafia. In this vein, David Mayer Rothschild stressed that last year’s Copenhagen environmental summit was “an attempt to establish a world government.”
Likewise, AFP editor Jim Tucker reported on March 24, 2007 that General Lord Guthrie, director of N.M. Rothschild & Sons, said political leaders should “address the global climate crisis with a single voice, and impose rules that apply worldwide.”
The Rothschilds have spent huge amounts of money promoting the global warming hoax. Goldman Sachs is obviously an arm of their empire, whereas BP is among a host of companies in Nathan Rothschild’s portfolio.
A TEAM EFFORT
Considering the nature of these prominent players, one factor binds them all together. Cap and trade, via the CCX, will tax carbon-dioxide emissions and generate trillions in revenue. Only a month ago, however, this legislation sat dead in the water with virtually no support from Congress or the American public. But now, with an environmental catastrophe at hand, could it be resurrected and enacted in a way that mirrored President Clinton’s counter-terrorism bill following the OKC bombing?
Ironically, big oil and global bankers are two of the most ardent supporters of climate change legislation. In this sense, seeming adversaries such as “environmentalist” Gore and BP are on the same team; as are Cheney’s Halliburton, Goldman Sachs and Obama’s CCX. It should also be noted that prior to their demise, the corrupt Enron Corporation lavished huge amounts of praise on cap and trade legislation.
Lastly, if gasoline prices surge this summer due to the Gulf of Mexico spill, one obvious benefactor will be the new green-friendly “smart cars” owned by GM (Government Motors).
As AFP goes to press, all containment efforts have failed as millions of gallons of oil continue to gush into the Gulf of Mexico on a weekly basis.
Victor Thorn is a hard-hitting researcher, journalist and the author of many books on 9-11 and the New World Order. These include 9-11 Evil: The Israeli Role in 9-11 and Phantom Flight 93.
Could the catastrophic Gulf of Mexico oil rig explosion be part of a larger scheme to “reform” the energy industry, just as the Obama administration has “reformed” healthcare, banking and automobile manufacturers? Worse, is “cap and trade”—possibly the worst legislation ever penned—the ultimate endgame behind this spill, which they are now capitalizing upon?
I want to get back to the timing of the blowing up, the explosion out there in the Gulf of Mexico
of this oil rig. ...
Now, lest we forget, ladies and gentlemen, the carbon tax bill, cap and trade, that was scheduled to be announced on Earth Day. I remember that. And then it was postponed for a couple of days later after Earth Day, and then of course immigration has now moved in front of it. But this bill, the cap-and-trade bill, was strongly criticized by hardcore environmentalist wackos because it supposedly allowed more offshore drilling and nuclear plants, nuclear plant investment.
So, since they're sending SWAT teams down there, folks, since they're sending SWAT teams to inspect the other rigs, what better way to head off more oil drilling, nuclear plants, than by blowing up a rig?
I'm just noting the timing here.
10 suspects, and motives as to why the Gulf oil spill was an inside job
I’ve thought this from the beginning. This would be the perfect excuse for gas prices to skyrocket in the Bush years.
Just because prices haven’t gone through the roof doesn’t mean this wasn’t an inside job.
From DeadlineLive.info:
Yes I know… Not everything is a conspiracy, but I don’t let that stop me from theorizing, especially when a certain incident has so many beneficiaries. Sure, as Rhambo Emanuel is famous for saying… “Never waste a good crisis” – good enough, except this crisis in many ways places some oily egg right on his face.
While is possible that this TOO was just another example of “incompetence” or Mother nature fighting back… We owe it to ourselves to fully analyze the situation, its players, and beneficiaries.
Consider this a starting place for reasons that the Gulf of Mexico oil spill was an inside job, and go from there.
My point is not to convince you, but to make sure we aren’t missing anything by simply buying in to the Media version of events. In fleshing this all out I will be counting in two columns. Who stands to gain, and who had a motive and opportunity.
Whats fishy here is that all the witnesses have vanished! 11 people BTW (there’s that pesky 11 again).
There is no surveillance video evidence, even though we are talking about billions of dollars sitting offshore. Surveillance cameras at the BP gas stations, but not on their oil rig? Yeah… there were no cameras at the Pentagon, or at Oklahoma City either… wink wink.
Here is the list of suspects, not particularly in any order.
1) ENVIRONMENTALISTS. “Eco Terror” is a fact of life, For decades some of the most radical and dangerous groups have been environmentalists. In a way its hard to blame them. Most of the planet has been polluted by the Kleptocracy for decades. Through mind numbing propaganda, the environmental movement have been conditioned to believe that if drastic measures are not taken ASAP… Were all gonna Diiiiiiiiiiiiiie! (This “Movement” was started interestingly enough by the same peoplewho own BP, see below)
So its no wonder they capable of doing anything to save the planet.This includes targeting “capitalist” oil rigs.
(If I believed as they do, I might be just as capable of same.)
So its no wonder they capable of doing anything to save the planet.This includes targeting “capitalist” oil rigs.
(If I believed as they do, I might be just as capable of same.)
They have a motive. The question is, do they have the means. It would have been an incredible feat, but with enough planning, people and bravado… It could be done. I tend to lean very low on this one though. The collateral damage to the environment should rule them out altogether, and it would take a commando style raid on the armed rig. While its possible, it’s not likely. Count on them to exploit the problem just the same.
2) OPEC: The global economic war is a serious one with players from every ideology. OPEC stands to gain as this incident will effect the price of oil, supply and demand. When you loose millions of gallons of domestic oil, who do you go to to make up the difference? Yep.
We should also consider that an increase in off shore drilling, if it catches on, could cost OPEC 100’s of Billions annually. (We all heard Obama a few weeks back promising to do more drilling. Was that just pandering? See below) Therefore if OPEC could throw a monkey wrench into the works by causing a conveniently timed disaster, would they? Sure. Could they?
They have a motive. As for the means, they have that too.
The problem with pinning it one them is its too obvious, and it would be too much of a risk for them to attempt. Also the US (as Iraq) is a member, so…. would the US purposely attack themselves? Ok, dumb question. Still – I rule out OPEC, but will explore some of the members below.
We should also consider that an increase in off shore drilling, if it catches on, could cost OPEC 100’s of Billions annually. (We all heard Obama a few weeks back promising to do more drilling. Was that just pandering? See below) Therefore if OPEC could throw a monkey wrench into the works by causing a conveniently timed disaster, would they? Sure. Could they?
They have a motive. As for the means, they have that too.
The problem with pinning it one them is its too obvious, and it would be too much of a risk for them to attempt. Also the US (as Iraq) is a member, so…. would the US purposely attack themselves? Ok, dumb question. Still – I rule out OPEC, but will explore some of the members below.
3) Shrimp and Fish (IE: Food) cartels. (Today, the US harvests over 650 million pounds of shrimp a year, more than any other country. And still this is not enough to fill the need, in spite of shrimp-farming. The US imports yet another 200 million pounds a year. )
Yeah, yeah Its a stretch. Obviously the price of a shrimp cocktail will be out of site for the next few years. While the cartels do stand to gain, have access to this part of the world, and the money to make it all so… Its just too out of the realm of reality. (We can keep in mind that many on this list cross pollinate, and have some of the same owners!)Our hearts go out the the families who will lose their livelihoods while the cleanup continues.
Yeah, yeah Its a stretch. Obviously the price of a shrimp cocktail will be out of site for the next few years. While the cartels do stand to gain, have access to this part of the world, and the money to make it all so… Its just too out of the realm of reality. (We can keep in mind that many on this list cross pollinate, and have some of the same owners!)Our hearts go out the the families who will lose their livelihoods while the cleanup continues.
4) THE SECURITY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX: Always looking for new people to protect, and tied in to some of the most nafarious groups the world over, the SIC could definately befefit from the Oil Rig Distater. I would guess that someone already had the contract to train the men and protect the rig. Well they failed, and a new player can now move in on the territory.
many companies under this banner can easily make something like this happen, but I am betting that the group holding the current contract stood down to make this happen. (unless a drug cartel was responsible) Whatever happens you can bet that all rigs will up their security after this. Cha CHING for the SID!
many companies under this banner can easily make something like this happen, but I am betting that the group holding the current contract stood down to make this happen. (unless a drug cartel was responsible) Whatever happens you can bet that all rigs will up their security after this. Cha CHING for the SID!
5) RUSSIA / VENEZUELA AXIS: The economic enegry war has been waged from the west on players like this. Like OPEC, they always stand to gain when oil becomes scarce. No doubt they cheered when they heard the news! Oil futures have been artificially high as of late and I attribute that to some back door negotiations with the US.
Russia obviously has the know how (tetonic and exotic waeponry) and would do the deed if they were sure they wouldnt get caught. It lays them out for FULL ON retailiation though. This is why I would have to rule them out for now. Poke the Tiger and get your head bitten off.
Russia obviously has the know how (tetonic and exotic waeponry) and would do the deed if they were sure they wouldnt get caught. It lays them out for FULL ON retailiation though. This is why I would have to rule them out for now. Poke the Tiger and get your head bitten off.
6) BP: Would BP attack itself? Uh … the 7/7 underground bombing is London says YES. What would be their motive?
Higher oil prices which might be canceled out by the bill for all the damages? No… the only reason for their involvement is… ha ha EVERY CUI BONO IN THIS ARTICLE. They ARE the environmental movement, They Are western / global intelligence. They ARE the drug smugglers. They are the economic hit men!!!! This makes BP a prime suspect, at least for a stand down and a cover up.
Higher oil prices which might be canceled out by the bill for all the damages? No… the only reason for their involvement is… ha ha EVERY CUI BONO IN THIS ARTICLE. They ARE the environmental movement, They Are western / global intelligence. They ARE the drug smugglers. They are the economic hit men!!!! This makes BP a prime suspect, at least for a stand down and a cover up.
7) GULF DRUG CARTELS: One of the things that Mike Ruppert did best was to blow the whistle on how offshore oil rigs were being used as a drop, and ship for Cocaine and other elicit drugs. He implicated Halliburton (KBR) in doing so (see below)
The theory here is that the Gulf Cartel(s) wanting to wipe out the CIA / MI6, et al competition and strike a blow to the oligarchs in the process. The cartels are militarized, well trained, and extreme. They have the funds to buy whatever was needed to blow the rig and get rid of the witnesses. They have to be in consideration for prime suspect at this point, but it would have been a HUGE risk for them.
GLOBAL INTELLIGENCE / CIA:This would run as a opposite to the benefits gained by Russia and Venezuela, OPEC etc… The prime target would be China in this regard. The shadowy world of economic hit men has been detailed extensively by Jim Norman (the Oil Card) and John Perkins (Confession of an economic hit man) Unlike the environmentalist movement, GI doesn’t care one whit about collateral damage. People get hurt by them all the time. They might even want this kind of Chaos and distraction. If you analyze it, this theory probably makes the most sense. So they have the motive, the track record, and the resources to pull it off. Top suspect IMO.
9) HALLIBURTON: These guys, like Bechtel.. are very powerful. So powerful in fact, that they can escape blame for the spill, and turn it into huge profits. While they should be considered a perfect accomplice to Global Intel groups, they would not likely be the masterminds. This is because they are doing everything they can to keep a low profile, after years of bad publicity. They would play a part, but not chance much more.
10) DNC / SOROS / AL GORE / FOB’s (OBAMA’S BACKERS) “Spill baby Spill” will now replace “Drill Baby Drill” which should cripple and pro drilling America first style energy policy previously sloganized by Aw Shucks Sarah Palin and crew. This would mean that Obama’s announcement to increase off shore drilling was a well timed ruse they had no intention of following through on. That’s done now, and so is anyone who wants to use it as a political weapon against cousin Barry and Crew.
Obama backers can see this and the Mine tragedy last month as a win for their “Green” energy cabal. Of course they have all the tools necessary to not only pull this off, but to cover it up. They have to be considered prime suspects. Their actions going forward will either give them away or vindicate them. We are watching!!!
Obama backers can see this and the Mine tragedy last month as a win for their “Green” energy cabal. Of course they have all the tools necessary to not only pull this off, but to cover it up. They have to be considered prime suspects. Their actions going forward will either give them away or vindicate them. We are watching!!!
SUMMERY [sic]:
Thanks..
http://pinroot.wordpress.com/2010/05/01/10-suspects-and-motives-as-to-why-the-gulf-oil-spill-was-an-inside-job/
http://seeker401.wordpress.com/2010/06/18/was-gulf-spill-an-inside-job/
No comments:
Post a Comment